What Prompted Article 1?

Over the years, in Freetown there have been instances of contaminated well water or of wells going dry because of interference other than natural causes.  Most frequently, the cause of wells going dry, other than naturally, is because commercial excavation closes the fissure  - the crack in the rock that allows water to flow through- that supplies water to the private wells or commercial excavation significantly lowers the water table, causing wells to go dry.

FreetownWater wants to protect the ground water that supplies our private wells.  Most residents in Assonet and Freetown depend on well water for their drinking water.  Very few residents have town water.  Some residents use both town water and well water.  FreetownWater thought since most people in town rely on well water for drinking, cooking, showering, bathing, watering lawns, flushing toilets, etc., that it would make sense to protect our main supply of water. Article 1 protects ground water everywhere in Freetwon and Assonet - not just in one location.

This is not about any one company. This is about 5 families loosing their water in East Freetown and their neighbors 3 streets away don't care because it doesn't affect them.  7 wells in Assonet go dry and families in East Freetown don't care because their water is fine.  FreetownWater began to wonder, what would happen if we DID start to care about each other?  What would happen if a neighbor in Assonet could empathize with a neighbor in East Freetown?  What if people began acting like we were all 1 town instead of 2 villages, each unconcerned with what did not directly affect them?

Instead of leaving 3 families in East Freetown on their own to fight to protect their wells, and 7 families in Assonet on their own to re-drill their wells at their own expense and 6 more families in town on their own over an issue involving their wells - what if instead we just universally protected the groundwater in all of East Freetown and all of Assonet?  What if everyone's well and everyone's water supply was protected and no family anywhere in town had to wage the war on their own, at their own expense, with no support after something bad happened.  What if we all together decided to protect each other from having something bad happen in the first place?

This is what prompted Article 1.

Tell your neighbor that you are capable of caring. Please vote YES to protect your water, your neighbor's water, everyone's water because it's everyone's town.

Rebuttal to Mailing

Did you receive a postcard in the mail from CCA?    

Here is what they don't want you to know.  

Their mailing claims that CCA is a "responsible business."  Since CCA began blasting, abutters have suffered serious property damages.  Does that sound like a responsible business?

CCA claims that Article 1 would "prohibit commercial excavation."  This is not true.  It would not PROHIBIT it.  Article 1 would simple LIMIT commercial excavation to above the average annual mean water line.  Gravel pits and quarry's would be able to mine as long as they do not go below the average mean water line.  

CCA says they are fully permitted.  Did they tell you that for the first 4 years of their operation they were violating 9 conditions of their permit? Did they tell you that citizens had to hire a lawyer to get the Soil Board to hold a Public Hearing on the permit renewal for CCA?  Did they tell you that large groups of neighbors showed up at the public hearing to complain about their homes shaking, the loud noise, the constant could of dust, sedimentation in their water after blasts?  Did they tell you that the Selectmen passed a new law that allows them to renew the permit without any more public hearings?  CCA had a SERIOUS FLYROCK incident after their permit was renewed.  

CCA says the blasts last about half a second. A fatal car crash can be caused in half a second.  A deadly fire can start in half a second. It is not the length of the blast, but the damage it causes to property and people's lives.

 If CCA "commissioned an “independent” sound study i.e. - they selected who would conduct the study and paid them for doing it- is it really "independent?"

CCA sites a DEP study to say they are not affecting wells.  The DEP only tested for pro-chloride contamination in wells. The DEP did not test for sedimentation. The DEP did not test for water quantity.   The DEP could NOT DEFINITIVELY say that the quarry did not or could not affect water quantity.  

CCA is one company and their mailing is intended to protect the interest of their one company. Not one owner of CCA lives in Freetown.   FreetownWater wants to protect everyone who depends on wells for drinking water.  FreetownWater wants to protect reresidents in Freetown from serious nuisance that interferes with a homeowner's right to enjoy or even be safe on their own property.  Do you personally pay rent or a mortgage?  Do you personally want to enjoy your home and yard?  Do you personally depend on well water?   Why would you vote for CCA's interests above your own?

Vote for YOU.  Vote YES for Articles 1 and 2.